TIC 3.0 (UPDATE)

TIC 3 Update

TIC 3.0 (UPDATE)

Last summer, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) released core guidance documentation for the Trusted Internet Connections (TIC) program. The TIC 3.0 updates are aimed to better assist agencies with protecting modern information technology architecture. 

While the updates are significant, there’s a consistent theme throughout TIC 3.0: the federal government is more in tune with the cloud, opening the door to more innovation, flexibility, and opportunity than ever before.

Here are five major takeaways from TIC 3.0.

Descriptive, not prescriptive guidelines

Previously, TIC 2.0 featured a 75-page reference architecture document that outlined a hard line between the federal government’s boundary and everything outside of it. The guidance required each individual agency to figure out how to interpret that line and limit the entry and exit points.

The spirit of TIC 2.0 sought to limit internet access points, causing TIC-specific infrastructure to be deployed in Federal data centers. As agencies started moving to the cloud, TIC 2.0 still mandated that traffic needed to travel through these TIC architectures, largely on premise. This resulted in some very complex networking constructs that at best minimized the benefits of the cloud, such as elasticity and ability to scale. 

Since that time, the federal government’s need for innovation facilitated by cloud adoption has driven the need for TIC 3.0.

In contrast, TIC 3.0 offers considerations around security deployments but also allows for innovation as it relates to a trusted internet connection, without outlining the specifics of the implementation. In other words, TIC 3.0 is a descriptive approach, not a prescriptive one. 

While this update enables innovation, it also leaves a lot of judgment calls around how to implement the guidance up to agencies. For example, a partner that has had experience with multiple public sector implementations across a variety of agencies can bring additional insights to bolster an agency as they figure out how to navigate these decisions. 

TIC 3.0 offers considerations around security deployments but also allows for innovation as it relates to a trusted internet connection, without outlining the specifics of the implementation. In other words, TIC 3.0 is a descriptive approach, not a prescriptive one. 

Distributed and elastic security capabilities

The TIC 3.0 update is the closest thing yet to a zero-trust model the federal government has produced for a Trusted Internet Connection. The new guidance introduces “security capabilities” in two broad categories:

  • Universal capabilities: enterprise-level capabilities that outline guiding principles for TIC use cases
  • Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) capabilities: network-level security capabilities that inform technical implementation for a use case

Instead of offering a strict prescription for what must be done, the guidance provides policies for deploying in the cloud closer to the data — a far better security model. Rather than all information flowing through a centralized architecture, PEP security capabilities can now reside very close to the end user. You can also create PEPs across a distributed network, allowing you to scale and distribute resources as you see fit.

In addition, TIC 3.0 guidance specifically addresses pilot activities, emerging technologies, and threat insights as they’re discovered, and will update the security capabilities catalog along the way. The catalog is purposefully built to be elastic and flex with the federal computing landscape as it grows.

Flexible trust zones that facilitate innovation

PEPs must be considered when protecting systems or data within the target architecture, but there’s also the concept of trust zones. Historically, trust zones fell into one of two categories: trusted or untrusted. But the way these zones are applied in TIC 3.0 architecture is more evolved.

Agencies can now make the consideration between highly trusted, moderately trusted, or low-trusted security stances. That distinction creates a building block approach for agencies. If they highly trust one system in the cloud, they can deploy a customized set of security capabilities for that trust level and risk matrix at PEPs. Alternatively, a low-trusted system would require more security capabilities. That level of flexibility drives innovation.

You can even have two systems hosted in the same place conceptually with two different levels of trust. For instance, if the threat matrix against a workload is higher — certain workloads may be more susceptible to DDoS or other types of malicious attacks — or user access needs to be different, you might classify your trust zones differently.

Tool misconfiguration is one of the top security lapses in cloud technologies, not the capability of the tool. Gartner estimates that “through 2025, 99% of cloud security failures will be the customers fault.” Most of the headlines in cloud security issues that have caused panic were due to someone who didn’t understand how to configure properly for a particular workload.

As you’re defining these trust zones and the tools that make up your PEPs, having a partner who’s previously helped agencies define responsibilities, risk acceptance, and implemented the technology stacks to complement the strategy can protect against this kind of misconfiguration with much more confidence. 

Continuous validation instead of a point in time

With TIC 2.0, you had to pass a TIC compliance validation as a point-in-time exercise. Federal Network Security would look at your system through a lens of validation and determine compliance. While compliance was important to achieve, that validation only applied to a specific moment in time.

The TIC 3.0 updates provide a higher level of accountability through the idea of continuous validation, particularly with cloud systems. CISA is deploying cloud capabilities through the Cloud Log Aggregation Warehouse (CLAW) under the Continuous Detection and Monitoring (CDM) and National Cybersecurity Protection System (NCPS) programs.

Rather than a specific point-in-time validation, these programs request logs be sent continuously for ongoing validation. They’re facilitating innovation on one side while stepping up compliance and enforcement on the other side through a continuous validation footing. Anyone who’s been working with big data technologies can figure out how to get logs into CLAW. Doing that in a cost-effective way with the tools that will be most impactful is less obvious, which is another area where a partner can contribute.

Where a partner comes in

The biggest takeaway from these TIC 3.0 updates is that you don’t have to navigate them alone. An experienced partner can help you:

  • Digest the descriptive nature of TIC 3.0 guidelines and align it with your agency’s mission and internal security requirements
  • Define trust zones and configure the tools that will make up your PEPs while significantly reducing the risk of misconfiguration
  • Accelerate innovation while embracing the spirit of the TIC 3.0 building block model

There are a lot of exciting changes within these core guidance documents. With the right partner on your side, you can continue to cloud confidently while reaching new heights of innovation.